Healing America’s Narratives: What’s Love Got to Do With It? Part 2

[Part of our ongoing exploration of Healing America’s Narratives: The Feminine, the Masculine, & Our Collective National Shadow, this essay continues our exploration of Chapter Twelve’s inquiry into the role of love — and its lack — in American culture. The book is available here.]

In Part 1 of this inquiry into love, we introduced Br. David Steindl-Rast’s, Dr. M. Scott Peck’s, and Marianne Williamson’s respective reflections that love is “the joyful acceptance of belonging,” “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth,” and the absence of fear.¹

With the intersection of these views of love as our starting point, let’s explore how we might observe the presence or absence of love and actually “practice” love in our own lives, and observe the presence or absence of love in others and decide how much time we want to spend being around and influenced by those whose behaviors discourage the healthy manifestation of love.

The previous post ended with these words: “With whom and what do you joyfully accept belonging? For whom are you willing to extend yourself? How does it feel — or might it feel — to live a moment, a day, a year, or lifetime in the absence of fear?” Each of these depictions of love can be observed and practiced.

To what extent do you joyfully accept belonging — to and with yourself, members of your family, your friends, colleagues, neighbors, pets, written, visual, and audible sources of information and entertainment, strangers, those you disagree with, and the natural world? How might you practice joy, acceptance, or belonging to and with any one of these?

To what extent are you willing to extend yourself in order to nurture your own growth or the growth of others? Where is the boundary beyond which you are not willing to extend? These questions are not intended to elicit guilt, shame, or inadequacy — no one can be all things for all people. Healthy boundaries are essential for a healthy life. A commitment to everyone and everything is most likely a commitment to no one and nothing.

How familiar are you with a feeling of no fear (or anxiety or worry)? What might an absence of fear feel like, and how might it manifest? Imagine a moment (or longer) during which what you habitually fear, worry, or hold anxiety about does not exist. Engage your senses — see it, feel it, hear it, taste it, and smell it — how does it look, feel, sound, taste, and smell? Is it light or heavy? Is it expansive or contracting? How might you practice letting go of fear, anxiety, or worry?

We’re not speaking here about the immediate, rational fear that comes up as the bear or large dog attacks, as the tornado or tsunami approaches, or as the gunshots ring out in the school, store, or church. We’re referring to the habitual, heavy, persistent state that arises not from an immediate threat, but from a pattern of attention to and concern about an uncertain future. How would it feel to let that go?

Love is always present. It becomes palpable when we let fear go.

My experience, ironically, is that this needs to be an ongoing practice. We must practice love — despite its pervasive presence.

_____

  1. The “joyful acceptance of belonging,” is from Br. David Steindl-Rast, Gratefulness: the Heart of Prayer, (Paulist, 1984), 167; “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth,” is from M. Scott Peck, The Road Less Traveled, (Simon & Schuster, 1978), 81; and ‘the absence of fear’ (not a direct quote) is based on Marianne Williamson’s reflections on A Course in Miracles, (Foundation for Inner Peace, 1976, 1992) in A Return to Love, (HarperPaperbacks, 1993).

Healing America’s Narratives: Assumption, Fear, and Resistance to Change

[Part of our ongoing exploration of Chapter Eleven of Healing America’s Narratives: The Feminine, the Masculine, & Our Collective National Shadow, this essay explores why it often feels like we’re immune to change. The book is available here.]

Photo © by Suzanne D. Williams on Unsplash

We know that change can be unsettling, even scary, whether it’s exterior change imposed by events such as war, weather, or pandemic, or prospective interior change of beliefs, values, or view, beckoning for our attention. As we continue our exploration of Chapter Eleven’s foundational question, “So, now what?” we’ll briefly consider here a model of how and why we resist change.

For more than two decades, Robert Kegan and Lisa Lahey have researched, developed, and implemented their “immunity to change” approach to understanding and overcoming individual and organizational resistance to change. In workshops and in their 2009 book, Immunity to Change, they present a nuanced four-column process that asks us to identify in column one, our goals — what we are committed to changing.¹ [e.g. I want to spend less time looking at my phone.]

In column two, we list what we do or don’t do that obstructs the path to achieving these column one goals. [I use my phone to get news, for entertainment, for being in touch with friends and family, as an alarm clock, and to search online. I always have it within arms reach. I don’t allow myself to be away from it.]

In column three, we first name what we’re afraid might happen if we stop the column two behaviors that we do engage, or actually engage the column two behaviors that we avoid; [I’m afraid I’ll miss out on something important; I’m afraid my friends and family will think I don’t care about them; I’m afraid I won’t be up to date on the news and might appear ignorant…] and then the competing commitments that underly these fears [I’m committed to not missing out on anything; I’m committed to not letting my friends and family down; I’m committed to not appearing ignorant…]

In column four, we explore the assumptions that inform the competing commitments [I assume that if I miss something important, terrible things will happen; I assume that if I don’t respond to family and friends quickly they will think I don’t care; I assume that if I’m not up to date on the latest news, others will think I’m ignorant…].

In Kegan and Lahey’s exploration of assumptions, they ask us to determine (test) whether the assumptions are true or false, and they label any assumption that was previously unconscious or that was conscious but untested, as a Big Assumption — worthy of investigation. Unconscious or unexplored assumptions have us. We have assumptions once we are aware of and have tested them.

With these steps laid out across a four-column worksheet, an “immunity to change map” depicts an immune system that is designed to keep us safe:

“…the set of big assumptions collectively makes the third-column commitments inevitable…it is clear how they sustain the immune system: The third-column commitments clearly follow from the big assumptions and generate the behaviors in column 2; these behaviors clearly under-mine the goal in column 1.”²

As with re-visioning narratives and owning and integrating Shadow, Kegan and Lahey’s immunity to change process helps us uncover what is hidden — competing commitments and big assumptions — so we might move forward in a more integrated way.

____

  1. Robert Kegan, and Lisa Laskow Lahey, Immunity to Change, (Harvard Business Press, 2009). The process is “nuanced,” detailed, and specific and unfolds most accurately and effectively through numerous conversations and drafts (i.e. rushing through it is not a skillful approach). Their chapter 9, “Diagnosing Your Own Immunity to Change” is available here: https://mindsatwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Chapter9.pdf
  2. Kegan and Lahey, 250.

Healing America’s Narratives: I Am Going To Die

[Part of a series, this essay explores a subheading from Chapter Eleven of Healing America’s Narratives: The Feminine, the Masculine, & Our Collective National Shadow. Now available.]

Photo ©by Philippa Rose-Tite on Unsplash

We’re returning to Chapter Eleven of Healing America’s Narratives after our departures in the previous two posts — the inevitability of the current state of the country and the apparent belief, shared by both Democratic and Republican leadership, that they need never-ending millions of advertising dollars in order to win elections and defeat each other (for the good of the country).

“I am going to die” is the fifth of six statements and questions that frame Chapter Eleven, which explores some approaches to manifesting the book’s title — Healing America’s Narratives. The statement is ‘simply’ an acknowledgment of what is — what’s true — that given enough time, we all die. No one knows how, when, or where, but with each breath we take, we get closer to our final breath.

Our responses to the some of the earlier questions and statements from Chapter Eleven inform how we might respond to this acknowledgment of our mortality. If who we think we are is simply an assembly of flesh, bone, instinct, thought, and mood — nothing but separate animated objects with a few shared traits and some noticeable differences — then the horrors of the histories of womenNative AmericansAfrican Americans, the Vietnam War, the post-9/11 war on terror, and other significant histories, while still horrific, make sense in an ignorant, arrogant, fearful, bigoted, violent kind of way.

If, however, we all share an origin, a common ancestry — whether through a religious or a scientific story — and if we each have a unique ecological niche — our ultimate place in the world, our Soul, expressed through mythopoetic identity as a one-time-only manifestation of Spirit, All That Is, God, Source, Ground of Being — then it becomes a tad more difficult — it makes no sense at all — to proclaim the supremacy of any race, to declare you’re either with us or you’re with the enemy, or to in any way dehumanize others. The stories we choose about who we are, really, make a difference.

Each of us has our own dying and death stories. If we’re lucky we get to bury our parents and older siblings, our grandparents, aunts and uncles, and others from the generations that precede us. Some of these deaths, while sad, are expected and feel natural; sometimes they are unexpected and feel tragic. What is the story each of us tells, what is the story that you choose to tell, about the inevitability of death? As Mary Catherine Bateson told us, “The choice you make affects what you can do next.”¹

The late surgeon and author, Sherwin Nuland, wrote that death results “all too frequently [from] a series of destructive events that involve…the disintegration of the dying person’s humanity,” and that he had not “seen much dignity in the process by which we die.” Nuland, however, complemented his surgeon’s intimacy with the sterility, knowledge, precision, life, and death of the operating room with his philosopher’s view and his poet’s heart. “The greatest dignity to be found in death is the dignity of the life that preceded it,” he told us.²

If you want a dignified death, your best bet is to live a dignified life. If you want a dignified country, your best bet is live, and help others live, a dignified life by coming to terms with things as they are, being the change you want to see in the world, and at the very least, doing more good than harm through your words and actions.

_____

  1. Mary Catherine Bateson, “Composing a Life,” Sacred Stories: A Celebration of the Power of Stories to Transform and Heal. Eds. Charles & Anne Simpkinson, (HarperSanFrancisco, 1993), 42–43.
  2. Sherwin B. Nuland, How We Die, (Knopf, 1993), “all too frequently…,” xvii; “The greatest dignity…,” 242.

Healing

America

Narrative