Healing America’s Narratives: What’s Love Got to Do With It? Part 2

[Part of our ongoing exploration of Healing America’s Narratives: The Feminine, the Masculine, & Our Collective National Shadow, this essay continues our exploration of Chapter Twelve’s inquiry into the role of love — and its lack — in American culture. The book is available here.]

In Part 1 of this inquiry into love, we introduced Br. David Steindl-Rast’s, Dr. M. Scott Peck’s, and Marianne Williamson’s respective reflections that love is “the joyful acceptance of belonging,” “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth,” and the absence of fear.¹

With the intersection of these views of love as our starting point, let’s explore how we might observe the presence or absence of love and actually “practice” love in our own lives, and observe the presence or absence of love in others and decide how much time we want to spend being around and influenced by those whose behaviors discourage the healthy manifestation of love.

The previous post ended with these words: “With whom and what do you joyfully accept belonging? For whom are you willing to extend yourself? How does it feel — or might it feel — to live a moment, a day, a year, or lifetime in the absence of fear?” Each of these depictions of love can be observed and practiced.

To what extent do you joyfully accept belonging — to and with yourself, members of your family, your friends, colleagues, neighbors, pets, written, visual, and audible sources of information and entertainment, strangers, those you disagree with, and the natural world? How might you practice joy, acceptance, or belonging to and with any one of these?

To what extent are you willing to extend yourself in order to nurture your own growth or the growth of others? Where is the boundary beyond which you are not willing to extend? These questions are not intended to elicit guilt, shame, or inadequacy — no one can be all things for all people. Healthy boundaries are essential for a healthy life. A commitment to everyone and everything is most likely a commitment to no one and nothing.

How familiar are you with a feeling of no fear (or anxiety or worry)? What might an absence of fear feel like, and how might it manifest? Imagine a moment (or longer) during which what you habitually fear, worry, or hold anxiety about does not exist. Engage your senses — see it, feel it, hear it, taste it, and smell it — how does it look, feel, sound, taste, and smell? Is it light or heavy? Is it expansive or contracting? How might you practice letting go of fear, anxiety, or worry?

We’re not speaking here about the immediate, rational fear that comes up as the bear or large dog attacks, as the tornado or tsunami approaches, or as the gunshots ring out in the school, store, or church. We’re referring to the habitual, heavy, persistent state that arises not from an immediate threat, but from a pattern of attention to and concern about an uncertain future. How would it feel to let that go?

Love is always present. It becomes palpable when we let fear go.

My experience, ironically, is that this needs to be an ongoing practice. We must practice love — despite its pervasive presence.

_____

  1. The “joyful acceptance of belonging,” is from Br. David Steindl-Rast, Gratefulness: the Heart of Prayer, (Paulist, 1984), 167; “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth,” is from M. Scott Peck, The Road Less Traveled, (Simon & Schuster, 1978), 81; and ‘the absence of fear’ (not a direct quote) is based on Marianne Williamson’s reflections on A Course in Miracles, (Foundation for Inner Peace, 1976, 1992) in A Return to Love, (HarperPaperbacks, 1993).

Healing America’s Narratives: What’s Love Got to Do With It?

[Part of our ongoing exploration of Healing America’s Narratives: The Feminine, the Masculine, & Our Collective National Shadow, this essay explores Chapter Twelve’s inquiry into the role of love — and its lack — in American culture. The book is available here.]

Regarding the subtitle’s question, the answer is, well, just about everything.

Over the course of some twenty years I paid attention to others’ views on love. I listened to friends and family, read fiction and nonfiction including scripture from various religions, and did my best to understand what I felt through my own direct experience. Three particular views among many spoke to me personally, and I “assembled” a working perspective on love that lives at the intersection of the three:

According to Br. David Steindl-Rast, Dr. M. Scott Peck, and Marianne Williamson’s reflections on A Course in Miracles respectively, love is “the joyful acceptance of belonging,” “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth,” and the absence of fear.¹

Throughout, amid, beneath, within, and above America’s collective national Shadow lurks a lack of love. Not that love doesn’t exist in the United States — it does — but where it is not lacking it most often manifests as an exclusive, conditional, qualified, and group-centric love.

We are willing to joyfully accept belonging with or to extend ourselves for the benefit of selected, but not all, others. Those other others we fear — sometimes explicitly, sometimes implicitly, but fear them we do.

Where this leads, has led, and will lead us is toward a deeper, truer, more inclusive, and less conditional — if not unconditional — love. Within the developmental shorthand that points to our increasingly inclusive, balanced, comprehensive, and complex movement through it’s about me, it’s about us, it’s about all of us, and it’s about all that is perspectives, an it’s about me orientation is the earliest and least inclusive view available to us.

But without a healthy iteration of this view, which allows each of us to love our self and makes it possible to look in the mirror and authentically say, “I love you,” to the essence of our reflection (give it a try), self-love remains repressed as part of our Shadow — and this repression inevitably limits the fullness of our love for any other(s). In Teachings on Love, Thich Nhat Hanh made it clear that, “Until we are able to love and take care of ourselves, we cannot be of much help to others.”²

Choosing to extend one’s self in order to joyfully accept belonging as, to, and with the perfectly beautiful, blemished being each of us is strengthens our will to extend our selves on behalf of the perfectly beautiful, blemished beings you, they, all of us, and all that is are. Both the foundation of healthy self-love and the expansion beyond it are essential.

In, Outlaw Culture, bell hooks expressed being puzzled by folks who authentically confront one “domination” while often passively supporting or ignoring another. She pointed specifically to black men who fought against racial discrimination but ignored the plight of women, and to white women who were on the front lines of gender discrimination but ignored the racial discrimination against their black sisters. She observed that many activists act on behalf of self-interest, attempting to end “what we feel is hurting us,” rather than on behalf of “a collective transformation of society, an end to politics of dominations.” She concludes:

“This is why we desperately need an ethic of love to intervene in our self-centered longing for change. Fundamentally, if we are only committed to an improvement in that politic of domination that we feel leads directly to our individual exploitation or oppression, we not only remain attached to the status quo but act in complicity with it, nurturing and maintaining those very systems of domination.”³

She clearly states the necessity for a love that moves from embracing what concerns me or my particular us to the wider embrace of all of us and all that is. Sound familiar?

Consider the words of Siddhartha Gautama, passed down by many, including Gandhi and King: “For hatred can never put an end to hatred; love alone can. This is an unalterable law.”⁴ Remember the words attributed to Jesus Christ: “Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another.”⁵

In Across That Bridge, John Lewis acknowledged the roles of faith, patience, study, truth, action, peace, and reconciliation in his vision for change in the United States. He also made it clear that for those who studied, trained in, and practiced nonviolence, “not simply as a tactic, but as a way of authentically living our lives — our sole purpose was, in fact, love.”⁶

In response to a question from Krista Tippett in 2020, author Jason Reynolds defined antiracism in this way:

“…[it’s] simply the muscle that says that humans are human. That’s it. It’s the one that says, ‘I love you because you are you.’ Period. That’s all…. That element of ‘I love you because you are you’ should be the most human thing we know. It should be a natural thing to say, ‘Look, I love you, because you remind me more of myself than not.’”⁷

While simple on the surface, those last eight words are subtly sophisticated and quite challenging when engaged beyond the conceptual — in the everyday world with other human beings. The prospect that you remind me more of myself than not recalls Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn’s recognition that our work is not so simple as separating all the good folks from the evil. It is more complex in that each human heart — each of us — carries the potential for good and evil.⁸

With whom and what do you joyfully accept belonging? For whom are you willing to extend yourself? How does it feel — or might it feel — to live a moment, a day, a year, or lifetime in the absence of fear?

_____

  1. The “joyful acceptance of belonging,” is from Br. David Steindl-Rast, Gratefulness: the Heart of Prayer, (Paulist, 1984), 167; “the will to extend one’s self for the purpose of nurturing one’s own or another’s spiritual growth,” is from M. Scott Peck, The Road Less Traveled, (Simon & Schuster, 1978), 81; and ‘the absence of fear’ (not a direct quote) is based on Marianne Williamson’s reflections on A Course in Miracles, (Foundation for Inner Peace, 1976, 1992) in A Return to Love, (HarperPaperbacks, 1993).
  2. Thich Nhat Hanh, Teachings on Love. (Parallax, 1998), 21.
  3. bell hooks, Outlaw Culture: Resisting Representations, (Routledge Classics, 2006/Routledge 1994), 243–44. In making her case for love, hooks also cites Peck’s “the will to extend one’s self…” view and King’s “I have decided to love,” 247.
  4. Eknath Easwaran, trans., The Dhammapada, (Nilgiri Press, 1985), 78.
  5. John 13:34, NIV Study Bible, (Zondervan, 1973, 1995).
  6. John Lewis, with Brenda Jones, Across That Bridge: A Vision for Change and the Future of America, (Hachette, 2012), 183.
  7. Jason Reynolds, “Imagination and Fortitude,” On Being with Krista Tippett, June 25, 2020, https://onbeing.org/programs/jason-reynolds-imagination-and-fortitude/
  8. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn. The Gulag Archipelago. Accessed via https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/13750-if-only-it-were-all-so-simple-if-only-there